Phaedra Brown on RERUN Xtended by Ashleigh Veitch

THE GIFT OF REPETITION:  RERUN Xtended

Choreographer and performer:  Ashleigh Veitch

Air Space Projects, Marrickville, Saturday 13th September 2025

Review by Phaedra Brown

Ashleigh Veitch’s RERUN Xtended is durational study of repetition and the staying power of both body and mind.

The two-hour long work was performed at the Marrickville Airspace Projects in their Deep Space room. This is a small concrete room with a low ceiling, no windows, and a fluorescent light. It’s deep in the gallery, the perfect sensory deprivation tank to cut us off from the outside world. Here in this space Ashleigh ask us to “rebel against hustle culture,” and truly focus our mind and body, as she does the same.

RERUN Xtended is designed so that audiences can come and go as they please. I sat and watched the first hour and found this exploration of repetition and duration rich with detail and full of ever evolving and engrossing movement.

------------------

Entering the gallery space, black tape frames the otherwise blank walls and floor. This creates a geometric grid of overlapping shapes, reminiscent of a city map, or the lines on a basketball court. Ashleigh is in the centre of the room.

Facing away from us, caught in a gentle rock, she begins shifting her weight from one foot to the other. The first thing I became aware of was how much I was able to notice within this holding pattern: the minute movement of stabilising muscles in Ashleigh’s legs; her breath and gaze; the cold air in the concrete space. The anticipation created from this ongoing rock gave me the time and space to search for clues as to what was about to happen.

One foot slides just a small distance along the concrete, then slowly returns to its original position. Then the other foot slides. This motion repeats, gradually increasing in size, while Ashleigh remains on the spot. With the textural scraping sound of sneaker on concrete we can hear the work of each repetition. The performance is also underscored by a low rumbling tone, designed by Ashleigh herself, that was constant throughout.  

In the vacuum of the room it was easy to get hypnotised by Ashleigh’s movement. So much so that outwardly all of a sudden, but actually over the course of several minutes, she had shifted the slide of her feet into walking on the spot—thus beginning the cycle of action that made up the bulk of the work. Foot slides back, weight shifts, the knee pulls through in front of the body, torso ripples upright, foot floats down, toe of sneaker hits the floor, foot relinquishes into the floor … and begin again. A simple walk is so rigorous that it draws us into its detail. With each step the angle of Ashleigh’s body changes slightly so that she is moving in a slow circle.

Small things seem so significant. One foot unexpectedly hovers. It takes a moment to register what has changed. We glimpse an alternate pattern. Just one cycle in which Ashleigh reverses her step before returning to the same forward stepping pattern. About a third of the way through the first hour, this was a smart variation as it broke our trance state and offered the audience a treat that refreshed our brain for the repetitions to come.

Having completed close to a half circle and facing most of the way towards the audience by now, Ashleigh’s hands begin to tense at her sides. As legs continue their walking loop, arms begin to raise, finally reaching for the ceiling. Ash is looking to the low roof that is close to her head and even closer to her fingertips—again the small gallery space forces us to zone in on the specifics of her movement.

RERUN Xtended is certainly a game of concentration. There is a play between the repetitive actions that continue as if caught in a slipstream, and the assertiveness required to begin a new action—to move against the momentum of an existing loop. Ashleigh’s poise in controlling the ebbs and flows of this interchange is impressive.

As her arms rise her torso gently rotates, creating a second loop in opposition to the legs that are still stepping on the spot. The upper and lower body split into their own repetitive actions. This made me consider what other loops were working within Ashleigh’s body: blood and air circulating, synapses firing, and one can only assume the brain drifting in and out of sharp attention.

By now Ashleigh’s arms and gaze have seamlessly lowered and she is turning the corner away from the audience again. Remnants of multiple loops remain, and the body still twists atop the stepping legs for a while. As Ashleigh turns to face the wall, completing her circle, she has returned to the gentle rock. The cycle is about to begin again, marking the half-way point in the two-hour performance.

In a work without dynamic shifts and changes such as this, Ashleigh’s choreography remained enticing. It contained peaks and troughs, moments where we could be intently invested or could let our thoughts wander, and it was incredibly detailed. While we were able to move away from the performance, I was hesitant to miss the slight changes that occurred, or risk losing the overall impact of her repetitions. With RERUN Xtended Ashleigh Veitch has created a world in which the minute shifts are the most riveting and the most important. She wants audiences to “test our attention” by focussing in on the minutiae of a repeated movement. This is a gift in today’s world of distraction and constant stimulation. To slow down, to hone in, and to attend to one task taking the time it takes, has become a rare luxury and this piece, RERUN Xtended, gives us the time and space to do just that.

RERUN Xtended

Air Space Projects, Marrickville NSW, 5-21 September 2025

Choreographer, performer & sound designer:  Ashleigh Veitch

Phaedra Brown is an independent dancer, choreographer, and producer. Her current practice draws on a collage of elements from movement, choreography and writing.

Lillian Shaddick on Rebecca Jensen's SLIP at INDance

Slip: movement, sound, and sensorial trickery

Neilson Studio, Sydney Dance Company’s INDance 2025, 14 August 2025

Choreographer and Performer: Rebecca Jensen

Composer and Performer: Aviva Endean

Review by Lillian Shaddick

I walked through The Rocks on my way to Sydney Dance Company, surrounded by the usual bustle of the city but unaffected by it. It was cold, loud, busy – trains, ferries, buskers, chatter filled the air – but I was inattentive to any of it. My attention was elsewhere, turned inward, muted by routine and anticipation. I wasn’t seeing, hearing or feeling my environment, I was watching the time, reliving the path I’d walked so many times before for casual evening dance classes.

Now I’m seated in the Neilson Theatre, second row from the back of the intimate raked seating. We are obscured in darkness, looking down onto a large, deep performance space. A woman throws herself onto the stage, landing on a mattress covered in an earthy printed sheet.

She rolls. She is wearing a velvet brown dress, braided blonde buns, a white head covering and chunky brown knee-high boots: a kind of medieval cosplay that looks out of place in the sterile white floor and bright artificial light. As she rolls, her bum lingers, suspended mid-air before her body collapses into itself with calm control. Each rotation draws her closer to centre stage, where a black backpack waits.

She reaches into it. A loud rustle accompanies her rummaging, followed by the plasticky slap and tear of a Doritos packet opening. The sounds seem exaggerated, and the source of that exaggeration is revealed as our attention shifts from the woman on the floor to the cluttered sound station on our left – an array of wires, sound boards, microphones, and equipment spill all over a white workshop table. Another woman, focused and deliberate, commands the area and its apparatus, eyes tracking the movement centre stage to time her sounds with precision. She only glances away momentarily to pick up or place down an object. Her intense focus contrasts with the dancer’s strong yet detached gaze, held steady out toward the audience.

Seated cross-legged on the floor now, the bun-headed woman lifts a chip from the packet and begins to munch. The crunches are loud, crisp, and slightly delayed. As we glance back to the sound table, the woman at the wires is taking measured bites into a large stick of celery held close to a microphone.

Initially, the sounds are heightened but convincingly synced. Gradually, her timing becomes less precise – intentionally mismatched? Surely: a gracefully extended arm is now paired with the sound of water pouring.

This is one of the opening sequences of Slip. It gently attunes the audience to what will follow: perceptual deception, dream-like scenes, and abstract escalation. Here, ASMR-style pleasure collides with sensory trickery, keeping us darting between the actions and sounds performed by these two women: our bun-headed performer/choreographer Rebecca Jensen and musician and composer Aviva Endean.

Slip was the first hour-long work in Week 1 of the annual INDance program, presented by Sydney Dance Company and held at the Neilson Studio. The piece began development in 2022, originally performed as a 20-minute performance for the Keir Choreographic Awards, before expanding for its 2023 showing at FRAME: A Biennial of Dance in Melbourne.

Slip is a dance performance. Jensen’s contemporary dance training is evident in sequences with barrel jump turns, deep back bends, and carefully choreographed movements that appear reversed. But there is nothing that is conventionally satisfying here. Jensen plays with dance as a means of provoking thought and feeling in nontraditional ways. What makes Slip affecting isn’t capital-D Dance, but the interplay of dance techniques with the practice of ‘foley’ – the art of recreating sound effects for film to enhance immersion. As noted in the programme blurb, the pairings of sound and movement here are “pulled apart and abstracted, entanglements are simplified, severed, and rewired to the point of absurdity

Just as we start to delight in the seamlessly complimentary movements and sounds, this alignment unravels. What we see, hear and believe are thrown into question, not only through the sonic-visual mismatches, but the lighting and visual design that join to mangle our perception. Jensen dances with, and independently from, an animation behind her: water-formed bodies that echo her movements. Sometimes she’s perfectly in sync with them, other times slightly out, and the varied synchronisation keeps us attentive and uncertain. Diachronically, the lighting gradually advances our sensory deprivation: we are introduced to Jensen in a brightly lit, clinical space with visual clarity – only to end in near-complete darkness, with nothing but Jensen’s dancing hands glowing blue.

For me, this sensation of skewed perception recalls my experience watching AI-generated videos that attempt to mimic reality – near authentic, yet just ‘off’. There’s something compelling and uncanny about them. They seduce the senses even as they trigger our internal alarms to look and listen closer. Slip is in this vein as a work – at its best it challenges our senses, urging us to refocus and question reality. Like a deep-fake AI generated clip, Slip draws us in with the familiar, recognisable and satisfying, but then unlike such videos that unintentionally cause us to question what we see, Slip purposefully but subtly curates this feeling.

As I left the theatre that Thursday night, my senses felt unusually activated – attuned to textures of sound and light that on my way there had dissolved into the background of the city. I was stopped in my path as the train stormed overhead on the Harbour Bridge. It rattled connecting structures, disturbed the air and I felt jarred by its presence. The headlights from a car as I crossed the road stung as I tracked its movement – perfectly pacing my strides with its approaching speed. As chatter and laughter spilled out of a pub, I analysed its varied qualities – bellowing forced laughter, English accents, and a mixture of hollering voices both deep and squeaky in pitch.

After an hour immersed in Slip’s perceptual distortion and its sensory misdirection, these familiar stimuli rang out with immediacy. No longer passive, quotidian background noise, they called me – they were real, and I was deeply attuned to their qualities. In that moment, I was reminded that our perception is not just a way of processing the world but a way of being in it. The body does not observe from a distance; it lives through perception. Slip made this clear: by disorienting my senses, it returned me to them.

SLIP

Neilson Studio, Sydney Dance Company’s INDance 2025, Week 1, August 14-16, 2025

Performer and Choreographer: Rebecca Jensen

Performer and Composer: Aviva Endean

Visual Design: Romanie Harper

LX Design: Jennifer Hector

Outside eye: Lana Šprajcer

Animation: Patrick Hamilton

Technical Operator while touring: Jordi Edwards

___

Lillian Shaddick is a freelance professional dancer and teacher, an active participant in various Sydney based dance scenes. Her Masters investigated the commercialisation and appropriation of samba no pé in Australia and her PhD looked at the embodied experience of learning and dancing flamenco; both were completed within the discipline of Theatre and Performance Studies (University of Sydney). 

Lexy Panetta on Catapult’s Outbound at PACT

New Dance Works from Emerging Makers

Producer: Catapult

Presented in collaboration with PACT Centre for Emerging Artists

Performances by

Remy Rochester & Angus Onley

Maddison Fraser

Review by Lexy Panetta

Catapult is a choreographic dance hub located in Newcastle that provides support, opportunity and residencies for contemporary dance and multi-disciplinary artists (both mid-career and emerging) across the Central Coast and the Greater Hunter Region.  

Their Outbound initiative is an extension on their Propel choreographic residency program that is designed to amplify regional dance voices and provide young artists with a metropolitan platform for performance. Catapult’s Outbound is not only the opportunity to mount performance in a theatrical space with stage design and live audiences but it also offers a site for experimentation, artistic inquiry and support for makers in the emerging and independent sector.

Catapult launched this initiative this year and presented a double bill at Sydney’s PACT Centre for Emerging Artists in Erskineville: a new work by emerging choreographers Remy Rochester and Angus Onley, and another by Maddison Fraser.

Rochester and Onley were up first with Please… continue?  a playful, theatrical, nuanced piece that hurtled into the shifting terrain of the human connection and relationships with a blend of absurdity, tenderness, and sophistication. Maddison Fraser’s solo Palyku Ngurra Dance was deeply personal, grounded in cultural memory and feminine strength, a solo journey of reconnection to heritage, land, ancestry, and identity.

Please… continue? Remy Rochester & Angus Onley

Remy Rochester and Angus Onley’s Please… continue?  begins with two chairs and a table placed centre stage, the dancers enter from opposite doorways either side of PACT’s black box space. These minimal props evoke an office, a waiting room, or any number of banal shared spaces we all regularly occupy. The dancers, dressed in blazers which further indicates we are in an office or at least some kind of professional setting. They skilfully utilise these jackets as an adjunct to the action, to indicate emotions in an astute manner: shuffling impatience as each dancer interrupts the other’s flow of action; unbridled competition, glancing and diverting each other’s gaze as they awkwardly try to take a seat at the table. The energy between them is palpable, and paired with their subtle dancerly gestural exchanges, they successfully confuse the audiences’ (and their own) perception of their relationship—is this attraction and repulsion. The gestures shift from avoidance to connection but there are hints of magnetism too. As the intensity of their interaction builds, their separateness fades and a shared desire to be closer grows.

Rochester and Onley’s complex duet navigates the awkwardness, chemistry, resistance, and possibilities of a relationship; be it real, imagined, or somewhere in between. The performers’ interplay reveals a spectrum of connection. They are alert, fearful, full of recognisable habitual behaviours and well practiced subtle avoidances, which build to a crescendo with a sophisticated sense of timing. The duet escalates in emotional intensity with moments of humorous release and goofiness as the dancers mimic conversations we recognise as their romantic momentum builds. This work is full of carefully choreographed partner work as they get closer, shifting each other’s weight, swinging one another around the space to the excitable and chaotic score of Caravan by John Wasson.

The build of playful intensity made me think that what is at play here is a series of wandering thoughts or a glimpse into the imaginary interactions of these two characters, what they would like to do rather than what they actually can do to each other. They perhaps offer more than their real relationship can allow to transpire. This is a dance of life in fast-forward or a kind of life tango. The contrasting scenes flicker like a movie as the performers show us their ever-changing relationship conundrums through intense choreographed partnering. I was impressed with how they continued their tango as they tumbled and rolled around without breaking intimate connection or embrace. They coiled around one another without sacrificing the speed and complexity of the choreography, which gradually spiralled them away and then again toward each other, whirl-winding in and out of each other’s embrace. Their bodies melt into and reject one another, we pass our time with them in shared movement, drama, stillness and silence.

The simple but effective use of lighting, designed by Theo Carroll, plays a crucial role in amplifying the chaos in this work. The dim red hues and a swinging light overhead conjure intensity while highlighting moments of comedy and fuelling the emotional gravity when there are sudden shifts in energy. A sheet becomes a powerful prop reflecting a comfortable connection or repellent barrier, changing meaning as the duet evolves. The movement continually rebounds from pedestrian, to poetic, abstract, to emotionally raw.

At the end Rochester and Onley untangle themselves and loosen their hold on one another, dissolving their connection. They depart through opposite blacked-out doorways, the same one’s through which they entered. Perhaps they’ve returned to the ‘real world’, leaving behind the fragmented dreamscape of what could have been. Whether romance, memory, projection, illusion or all of these at once, Please… continue? offers a multitude of stories that illustrate and question the absurd possibilities and expectations embodied in the vulnerable emotional uncertainty in our connections with one another. A sophisticated tale to tell for young makers such as these experimenting with ways to perform nuanced and complex stories.

Palyku Ngurra Dance Maddison Fraser

The second work was choreographed and performed by Palyku and Yindjibarndi woman Maddison Fraser. Palyku Ngurra Dance was a deeply personal work, grounded in cultural memory and feminine strength, a solo journey of reconnection to heritage, land, ancestry, and identity. Fraser’s long long hair is a feature, a central physical motif in the choreography and a symbolic extension of lineage, DNA, maternal bonds passed down from her mothers, and a conduit of cultural knowledge.

From the outset, Fraser moves slowly and deliberately arriving at centre stage. She’s accompanied by an atmospheric soundscape that she made herself with the assistance of Wiradjuri performer, choreographer, composer and mentor Amy Flannery. Fraser is dressed in a singlet and denim shorts. In her hands she holds an abundance of petals and flower stems, carefully dropping the flowers in a crescent formation that eventually forms a circle around her. Each flower is handled with care, as if a story or a memory is being planted back into the earth. Her hair ripples and sways as she encircles the space, and the movement of her hair drapes over her shoulder like a curtain, encasing her in her concentrated attention, introspection and focus toward something that seems very personal and sacred. I can see the feminine strength and nurturing that both her hair and the flowers evoke.

Within the flower circle Fraser kneels, performing, gentle careful movements then rising with intention to collect from all parts of the floral circle. It feels as if she tends and feeds energy into the stems of her flowers, and as she moves it looks as though the flowers are equally feeding energy into her as well. Her movements are sculptural and hypnotic: fluid undulating arms, spirals, and gestural phrases; arms wrapping in hair, and hair and arms wrapping her up in soft embraces.  The floral circle becomes a vessel of protection and comfort.

As Palyku Ngurra Dance builds in intensity and speed, Fraser’s movements become more erratic, spiralling out of control. Her hair, sweeping in large circular pathways starts to break the flower shelter around her. Her movements become wider and more powerful as she whirls upwards and outwards, swift motions destructing the circle, crushing petals underfoot and chaotically catching stems in her curls. This hypnotic state transforms Palyku Ngurra Dance from gentle and nursing fluidity and spirals into grief, release, and transformation.

Fraser’s floor work is layered with strength and softness. The interchangeable uses of her hair to house and sweep and mop, to bind, release, shield and expose her to and from us. Her hair is polysemous, telling the complexity and emotive layers of her story.

A costume change shifts the tone of Palyku Ngurra Dance. In her new attire—high-vis vest, socks, and work boots—Maddison Fraser is industrial. She’s on the move, angular, transforming the space. Her speed becomes more frantic, manic even. Flowers scatter. She walks with busy-ness and intention, storming about, pacing back and forth. She seems to be marking a collision between herself and labour, between the confines of industry and everyday life, between masculine and feminine energy and the conflict and longing for her traditions and heritage that previously surrounded her.

Exhausted, Fraser finally begins to descend to the floor close to the front row of the audience. She looks defeated, tired and vulnerable and slowly crawls backwards through the debris of the petals and stems. As she moves, objects appear, almost like she is coughing up the artefacts of her journey. These little objects are lined up, each one placed on the floor as she withdraws from the audience. A child’s sock, shells, bottle caps, pins, a truck are objects that she brings up to evoke the inherited chaos and turmoil of memory, trauma, and resilience.

By the end, Maddison Fraser has gathered everything together, flowers and objects, and she sits atop them, wrapped in high-vis like a sentinel of stories. Here she embraces all stories shared and embedded in her world. As she sits she is reflective, and the image of her cradling her past, embodying the tension of all her stories gathered beneath her, is very powerful.

This work skilfully grappled with Fraser’s personal identity, story and connection to her womanhood and kinship. Palyku Ngurra Dance embodies histories and truth telling, ultimately reflecting on strength, resilience and empowerment passed down through maternal bonds and shared history.

It was a joy to experience Catapult: Outbound, to watch courageous artists share their unique works with the city community. With thoughtful mentoring, and excellent production support, Outbound presented these emerging artists very well, celebrating their personalities, their histories, their differences and their potential.

OUTBOUND

Producer: Catapult

Presented in collaboration with PACT Centre for Emerging Artists, June 20-21, 2025

Works Presented:

Please… continue?

Choreographers & Performers: Remy Rochester and Angus Onley

Outside Eye/Mentor: Martin del Amo

Lighting Design: Theo Carroll

Music:

John Wasson Caravan  

Caleb Arredondo Endo Sax Ascent


Palyku Ngurra Dance

Choreographer & performer: Maddison Fraser

Cultural Consultant: Aunty Nat Stream

Music:

Maddison Fraser with mentor Amy Flannery

Didgeridoo: Wirrin Sam-Garlet

Dramaturg: Justine Shih Pearson

Alexandria (Lexy) Panetta is a Sydney-based independent artist, choreographer, and academic with interest in dance performance, improvisation, choreography, and film. Lexy also works part-time as a tutor at the Australian College of Physical Education (ACPE), is the Learning Associate for the Sydney Dance Company (SDC), and tours as a Teaching Artist for SDC.

Phaedra Brown on Happy Hour Plus

Dancing PLUS

Curator: Jane McKernan, ReadyMade Works

PACT Centre for Emerging Artists June 13-14, 2025

Performances by:

Ivey Wawn

Mitchell Christie

Valdi Yudibrata & Will Mak

Review by Phaedra Brown  

This rich evening of dance was described by Jane McKernan, Director of ReadyMade Works (RMW), as “Dancing plus… Dancing made more visible”. The ‘plus’ refers to the extra production support that PACT Centre for Emerging Artists in Erskineville provides, with their well-equipped theatre space, but it also refers to the ‘plus’ of RMW’s regular Happy Hour that, across the year, makes more visible the vast array of weekly goings-on within the walls of their studio in Ultimo. RMW is a place known for its essential contribution to the maintenance of dance in inner city Sydney. This artist run space offers various programmes and residencies that support the deep investigation of dance practice by local artists. Happy Hour’s guest curated short works-in-progress program is aplatform for encountering the diverse and uncompromising work being made by local dance artists”. Happy Hour Plus ups the ante and is curated by Jane McKernan.

At this year’s Happy Hour Plus, the third presented by RMW with PACT, three works by a wonderfully varied group of choreographer/dancers were offered: Ivey Wawn’s Feeling in a Triangle, Mitchell Christie’s Off the Map and Within by Valdi Yudibrata and Will Mak.

These works were vastly different in approach however all spoke to a very personal interrogation of each artist’s practice and a deep study of dancing.

Feeling in a Triangle Ivey Wawn

Ivey Wawn’s work Feeling in a Triangle began the night’s performances.

The lights snap on, revealing that Ivey has arrived on stage already, fallen into place in the darkness. After lying face down, breathing for a moment, different body parts begin to gently lift and lower—a shin, a shoulder, and eventually Ivy’s head lifts before she rises out of the floor, and comes to sit at a microphone placed at the front of the stage. A mirror is on the floor reflecting the microphone and Ivey, casting light and shadows up onto her face.

She prepares, taking in air as if about to speak. Waking up the breath in her mouth. Chuckling as the microphone falls out of place. A bird chirps in the rafters and she considers it part of the performance. She stares into the audience searching for faces in the darkness; a single note comes out of the silence. Then it comes again, in the same tone. Ivy begins to sing a broken melody. We hear “Falling is a feeling…Failing is a feeling.” She plays with the length and pitch of each syllable, searching for the right version of each note in real time, pressing the breath out of her lungs, nearing the end of their capacity. You can imagine how each note feels to produce.

An extended sung note plays over the speaker. Ethereal yet comforting vocalisations, music created by Megan Clune that shifts the previous spacious silence as Ivy sits.

She begins reaching her arms for the sky and the sides of the room. Shifting from position to position, she arrives in a shape, taking a brief pause to consider where she has landed before moving on. Her body is searching for something in these pauses – a feeling? a connection? perhaps a memory? This unhurried searching is interrupted by small quakes and falls.

Ivy kicks off her shoes and socks. Laughing, smiling occasionally. Catching, releasing, interrupting her own movement. Considering her task deeply then discarding it. Playing then urgently investigating. Purposeful and sporadic. She pauses on all fours, one arm reaching back towards the mirror, then resumes her dance of falling and feeling.

Oscillating through sensations, Ivey’s consideration is infectious. She moves through either knowing and understanding, or seeking to know and understand. I was desperate to know what she was looking for but at the same time took so much joy in watching the humanness of her search. Ivey works with a deep sense of curiosity that made me want to also experience the sensations she was moving through.

The music fades out. Snapped out of her investigation, she puts her socks and shoes back on quickly before leaving the space.

Throughout the work Ivey wore a white t-shirt that in bright bold letters read ‘GAZA’. Whether directly related to the work or not, this shirt is an important frame through which to view a work that called its viewers to empathy.

In Feeling in a Triangle, we get to see a body, but also very much a human, working through sensation. If we are in an era of disassociation and numbness, this piece was an exact antidote, drawing us into a world of urgent feeling and acting.  

Off the Map Mitchell Christie

Pink and purple light shines on Mitchell Christie who is caught in a shifting rhythmic groove. He stares straight into the audience and repeats a pattern of small shifts in the pelvis, knees, and heels—a small, serious, boogie.

As this groove continues, one hand raises to his belly and then snakes behind his back. The pattern in his legs changes to a gentle rock back and forth. He follows the threading arm to turn around and the pattern resumes facing the back. A more complex pattern arises, repeated rhythmic placing, holding, folding, and falling in a zig zag across the stage. The movement becomes more complex again, the repeating structure now dropped. Limbs reach on beat, the body falls and suspends, movements get extended and interrupted. Mitchell ties himself in knots before expertly and gracefully unravelling, like he’s engaged in a pre-meditated game of Twister. There is a task at play: constructing and deconstructing shapes, building then disrupting sequences.

The choreography requires Mitchell to continuously go further than expected: further coiled, further reaching, squatting all the way to the floor and suddenly standing to his full height. The movement is not robotic, but it is human-oid, almost uncanny when set alongside the groovy, driving music by Vatican Shadow. The sound begs for freedom and fun, and the strictly designed movement is resisting at every turn.

Mitchell’s face stays emotionless throughout. Even through the most precarious balances he seems to remain unphased. We can see his background in and allegiance to Cunningham Technique. He’s a passionate Cunningham teacher and in this work we are watching that influence: movement itself as subject and object of enquiry and performance. As Merce Cunningham explained: “It’s when dancing gets awkward that it starts to get interesting and this is where the thrill in watching Mitchell’s precarious movement lies.

Structurally, the work begins with contained restraint, but it branches out to take up more space, then is reigned back into the same small, serious groove at the end. Save one difference, perhaps. At the end almost imperceptibly (to the point where I may have imagined it) I thought I saw Mitchell’s lips moving. Maybe he was counting, or reciting a sequence, a gloriously tiny glimpse into the human behind the dancer and the rules behind the patterns?

Within Valdi Yudibrata & Will Mak

In this three-work evening the audience moved for the final piece by Valdi Yudibrata and Will Mak. For Within we were seated in a circle on the stage, looking in at the performers from all sides. From the outset this created a sense of collaboration and camaraderie that was felt throughout the piece. This is indicative of the street dance background shared by Valdi and Will, and indeed of many cultures that prefer to witness and contribute to dance in the round.

Valdi and Will begin in silence, facing each other. They are both watching and waiting for the other to move. Small shifts begin in their shoulders and fingers. Their impulse to move is based on cues from the other. Gradually learning from each other, they begin to build a shared movement vocabulary of isolation and syncopation. They circle each other.

Still in silence, the sound of their feet on the floor, the movement of their clothes and their breath creates the first soundscape. This dancer-created-sound is maintained throughout and propels the piece forward. It creates a great amount of silence and stillness amongst flurries of activity. 

They part and then meet each other again, face to face and closer together. As they circle we start to see the similarities and differences in their movements. Are these people two sides of the same coin? Friends or competitors?

A stamp signals the breaking of the circle.

Now next to each other, Valdi rubs his hands together, generating a rhythm. He continues this rhythm, hitting his body, then clapping. He plays with timing and the emphasis of beats. Will showcases his Popping expertise, playing with speed and intensity. They swap roles. Throughout this section the body percussion and movement correlate, but sometimes one dancer takes licence to move outside the bounds of the rhythm and through the beat.

Valdi unfolds a scarf and ties it around his waist. Valdi is a student of traditional Indonesian dance, as a way of exploring and reconnecting with his personal heritage. In this work he is exploring the meeting points between his Indonesian dance and street dance lineages.

Hitting the fabric of his trousers that stretches between his legs, slapping his forearms, jumping and stamping in a grounded shifting around the space, Valdi creates powerful punctuation to his movement that, while different to what we have seen, is reminiscent of the previous sections in its rhythm and syncopation.

Will echoes the sounds of Valdi’s solo as he picks up a shirt and hat. He uses the brushing of the fabric and the pulling taut of the hat to replicate Valdi’s percussion with a softer tone.

Throughout Within, elements of costume become symbolic of the dancers’ exploration of identity. In a poignant moment, Will meets Valdi on one side of the circular audience. Will offers Valdi a cap. Valdi seems at first reluctant to receive this symbol of street dance lineage, but eventually puts in on. It seems to signal a combining of style and culture, but also acceptance and solidarity. A way of showing that these two have joined forces. As their programme note states, Within is exploring identity “beyond birthplace, tracing the layers of history, memory, and movement that inform who we are. Through the language of street dance, we embody this shared journey—merging movement with existence”.

As the work concludes sharing becomes weaving, in and out of each other’s space, rising and falling; sometimes in confinement and conflict, sometimes in spacious and mutual support. After what has, up ‘til now, been a very structured investigation of each dancers’ individual identity, we finally see their shared forms woven together.

The final moment is a celebration. Music blares and both dancers let loose. They call friends from the audience to join them up on the stage, and Within concludes the night’s performances on a note of, above anything else, community.

Happy Hour has a long tradition within the programming of RMW. It began in 2016, and each iteration in the RMW studio shows the range of work being made in Sydney—from contemporary dance to street dance to the myriad of other forms that make up our Sydney based dance community. The plus of this Happy Hour Plus asked the audience to invest in three very different pieces as studies and to witness these dancers deeply at work. This was a night of dance that not only made the diversity of our local performers’ artistic investigations visible but allowed us to witness the earnestness PLUS rigour PLUS curiosity PLUS joy with which they created their work.

HAPPY HOUR PLUS 2025

PACT Centre for Emerging Artists, June 13-14, 2025

Curator: Jane McKernan

Works Presented: 

Ivey Wawn Feeling in a Triangle

Mitchell Christie Off the Map

Valdi Yudibrata & Will Mak Within

Sound Designers:

Megan Clune

Vatican Shadow

Lighting:

Theo Carrol

Nick Vagne  

Phaedra Brown is an independent dancer, choreographer, and producer. Her current practice draws on a collage of elements from movement, choreography and writing.

 

"Everyone’s a critic, they say. But most people aren’t filing on Tuesdays"

This is the first line of a recent piece in The New Yorker. For Joanne Imperio, Senior Photo Editor at The New Yorker, criticism “isn’t a hobby or a sideline or a way of sounding off. It’s a vocation, in the fullest sense, complete with deadlines and word counts and occasional moments of grace.”*

This is both true and not true for the dancers who write for Dancing Sydney. They do not, like those who write for The New Yorker, have to file on Tuesday. Timely-ness is not our intention or expectation—most things we ask them to write about have very short seasons so timeliness is not an issue. Their writing is also not a vocation, it’s a side hustle, and we don’t really pay attention to word count either. But we do hope for moments of grace in their writing.

We also encourage our (mostly) young writers to do other things that the New Yorker professionals apparently do: “attend not only to what something is but to what it almost is or might have been”. Like them, we encourage our writers to pay attention, as “really paying attention—is their stock-in-trade.”

As we move into spring and Dancing Sydney awakens from its winter hibernation we also agree with Imperio, that doing the above is “harder than it sounds.” These writers are asked to “linger” and sometimes to “poke”, to “turn things over like a suspect avocado.”

Some of these writers produce criticism, in its traditional form. Others report, profile, annotate the culture as it drifts by. Many do all of the above, sometimes in the same piece. […] What they don’t do is march in step. Some incline toward Olympian detachment, others missionary zeal. If they share anything, it’s a disposition: curious, alert, unsatisfied with the obvious, and mistrustful of what goes without saying.

And putting your hand up to be a critic “calls for nerve and an instinct for what deserves scrutiny and what’s better left alone.”

It’s easy to skim culture, to riff, to slot things into trend pieces. It’s harder to look closely, think carefully, and say something illuminating. To name what hasn’t been named yet. To craft lines that echo in people’s heads, or get under their skin.

Our young dancing writers might not always manage this, but Dancing Sydney hopes you enjoy reading them try.

Look out for new writing on Happy Hour PLUS (ReadyMade Works at PACT), Catapult’s Outbound (also at PACT), on dancing at the Sydney Fringe, Sydney Dance Company’s INDance, and Dirty Feet’s Out of the Studio.

____

* The New Yorker is sometimes hard to get for free. But you might be able to link to the whole piece @ The New Yorker, August 25, 2025, Portfolio. Critical Distance: Photography by Richard Renaldi.

Subscribe to our Substack newsletter here

Sarah Kalule on Illume

Bangarra Dance Theatre’s Illume: a culturally grounded testament to the potential of dance.

Frances Rings : Choreographer & Artistic Director of Bangarra Dance Theatre

Darrell Sibosado: Artistic & Cultural Collaborator

Gadigal Country, Sydney Opera House, 4th June 2025

reviewed by Sarah Kalule

A visually striking, splendid combination of visual art, music and dance, Bangarra Dance Theatre’s Illume debuted at Sydney Opera House’s largest theatre, the Joan Sutherland. After two decades in the smaller Drama Theatre, this was Bangarra’s time to grace the larger space—a venue long reserved for ballet, opera and other Eurocentric offerings; and I would say about time. Artistic Director Frances Rings marked this milestone with a work that affirmed Bangarra’s deep reverence for the continuity of Indigenous knowledge and cultural storytelling. With assistance from Artistic and Cultural Collaborator Darrell Sibosado, this reverence was evident in every aspect of the work. From the melodic chimes and sustained chords that gently underscored the audience’s arrival, we were taken on a carefully curated journey through Bardi and Jawi stories accompanied by symbolic patterns, textual set design, and the mystic intangibility of light. Dancers and design elements intertwined, stood apart, circled near, rearranged and settled. The choreography articulated the importance of Country, history, kinship and connection. It was a stunning performance, each section felt finely tuned and richly layered.

Illume was divided into eleven sections. In Shadow Spirits percussive rhythms and electronic techno synths filled the room while dancers stomped into the ground. In Mother of Pearl (Guan) a smaller group surveyed the geography of place while hands swiped heavily across arms and chests. In a transitional moment, a soloist made considered rotations of their spine and pushed a grand développé through thick air. In Manawan, velvety costumes caught glimmer as they passed under beams of light. In Blood Systems, patterns projected in stark blue-white light, fluorescent ropes wove into part-crosshatching, part-parachute, blinding the audience and exposing our witnessing gaze. Throughout the sections of Illume the dancers seamlessly flowed between unison, improvisation, solos and full ensemble sections. The spirit-filled choreography charged the space. It was highly detailed, sensorially overwhelming.

While awed by these fascinating elements, I left torn between the dazzling intensity of lights, action and sound, but yearned for a sharper assertion of urgency. The programme spoke to themes of climate change, displacement and the platforming of marginalised voices; but for me the message felt disrupted as I found myself lost in the spectacle. But perhaps this tension was the point, the work’s ambiguous manner was intentional, inviting the audience to do the work, the searching, and the reckoning with Illume’s themes. If this was the intention, then the unresolved friction between spectacle and narrative may have mirrored a significant relationship to Country—the importance of asking and being permitted. This was made clear through the work’s floor-to-ceiling partition which raised and lowered, at times veiling the performers and separating them from the audience. At other moments this partition was obscured by dark projections so we couldn’t see what was taking place, then it became transparent so that we questioned whether it was raised or hidden in plain sight. This blurring between the seen and unseen ensured it was only on the work’s terms that the audience was permitted to bear witness. Through this theme of permission, the partition symbolised a clear performer-audience divide, establishing a controlled gateway to accessing the work. The messaging I received was a reclamation of power, of narrative, of what is shared and what is kept sacred. Amongst the layering of many themes, one moment of difference stayed with me:

A physical and spiritual unveiling.

A quietening.

A firepit ignited.

Smoke rising.

Ash falling onto a circle of six.

Tender bodies bathing one another with smoke’s remains.

A collaborative couple rearranging red-brick plinths. 

Smoke swelling through the crowd.

Hot air embracing the highest point of my forehead.

This potent and poignant moment, Gajoorr into Middens, resembled a ceremony, or perhaps a remembering. I kept thinking, how lucky are we, the audience, to be invited into this sacred space. We are reminded of our visitation, here, on Country. We are asked to pause, to listen and to reflect.

After an abundance of movement that felt like it reached into the universe and burrowed deep into the earth, this moment zeroed in.

The spectacle dialed down.

The technical dancing ceased.

A communion commenced: gathering, clothing, stillness.

In contrast to the other sections filled with flashing lights, pulsing sounds and complex choreography, this quiet moment held dramatic weight, counterpointing the work’s overall flow. It offered a different pace, a different depth. Here, the simplicity of bonding around fire became a threshold into tens of thousands of years of practice, knowledge and ancestry. I could have watched this for hours. It could have been the entire work, and I would have been satisfied. This moment was a well performed take on less is more, and an impressive contribution to the overall work.

Illume is a testament to the potential of dance theatre that is both visually captivating and culturally grounded. Despite the first night jitters (a point that Rings mentioned as it was their first time presenting with all production elements combined) the standing ovation was well deserved. Frances Rings, Darrell Sibosado, the dancers of Bangarra Dance Theatre, and the entire creative team of Illume are to be commended for their immense dedication and their unwavering commitment to truth-telling through dance, theatre, music, visual art and light.

__________

ILLUME Bangarra Dance Theatre

Gadigal Country, Sydney Opera House, 4th-14th June 2025

Choreographer: Frances Rings

Artistic & Cultural Collaborator: Darrell Sibosado

Performers: Lillian Banks, Tamara Bouman, James Boyd, Eli Clarke, Kallum Goolagong, Daniel Mateo, Maddison Paluch, Edan Porter, Courtney Radford, Roxie Syron, Zeak Tass, Jye Uren, Kassidy Waters, Donta Whitham

Set Design: Charles Davis

Costume Design: Elizabeth Gadsby

Emerging Costume Designer: Rika Hamaguchi

Lighting Design: Damien Cooper

Video Design: Craig Wilkinson

Composer: Brendon Boney

Cultural Consultants: Trevor Sampi & Audrey (Pippi) Bin Swani

Rehearsal Director: Rikki Mason

Production Manager: Cat Studley

Bangarra Company Manager: Joseph Cardona

Bangarra Artistic Director & Co-CEO: Frances Rings

Online Programme

__________

Sarah Kalule is an artist exploring choreography, literature and experimental performance. With a strong interest in contemporary art theory, her current practice delves into her diasporic histories, theatrical jazz and presenting the body in space through bold imagery.

Zain El-Roubaei on Happy Hour #19

HAPPY HOUR #19: The Many Pockets of Sydney Street Dance

Gabriela Quinsacara: Guest Curator

ReadyMade Works, Ultimo, 5th & 6th April, 2025

Performances by:

Dechen Gendun with Genevieve Craig  

Patrick Huynh with Leon Endo, Takuma Takemesa, and Jeremy Iskander

Momoka Nogita with Vincent Kyle Garcia

Valdi Yudibrata with William Mak

review by Zain El-Roubaei

I got to watch ReadyMade’s Happy Hour #19 twice, both nights on a warm weekend in April, and it taught me that street dancers are generous witnesses. The show was an incursion of a sort, maybe even an infiltration of street dancers into ReadyMade's quarters, with its black floors always generating slightly too much heat, its wooden balcony terrace, a table donned with fruits for free, beer and wine for purchase, its lines for a bathroom tucked away in the corner, and its capacity to generate sweet conversation. Expanding what is meant by the ‘contemporary’ in dance, director Jane McKernan has made street styles a regular fixture at Happy Hour; in fact, six of the last eleven have involved street dancers. But during this one, Happy Hour #19, I understood something that felt true in my bones. I wrote it down: street dance is a gathering. One could say instead that street dance unifies, but I think that implies we are all similar and united among a shared vision. It’s not that. No, unify is too loaded a term: street dance does not unify; it gathers.

Gabriela Quinsacara curated this season’s Happy Hour, and it’s hard to imagine a better fit: her experience with various street styles—and more importantly, her experience with various street dancers—is extensive. This is someone who has danced, judged, taught, cyphered and shared with many pockets of the Australian dance scene. This is someone who has been a core part of the Sydney street dance crew Riddim Nation, a group that, among eight members, covers pretty much every street style—from waacking to breaking, from hip hop to Afrohouse and vogue femme, from popping to dancehall, extending even as far as headbanging and ska. Gabriela’s rigorous eclecticism, a playful traversing across street dance cultures at the highest level, is mirrored in her curation. We got to see Dechen Gendun, Sydney’s house & hip hop veteran; Patrick “Preemo P” Huynh, an explosive, unique and charismatic breaker; Momoka Nogita (Momo), a waacker relentless in refining her approach to her style and the stage; and Valdi Yudibrata, carrying within him a near-intimidating blend of krump, popping, choreography, and Randai, a dance from the Minangkabau people of West Sumatra.

In the first of these four mini-performances Dechen Gendun collaborated with Genevieve Craig. What shines immediately is Dechen’s detail, poise, subtlety; and it seems her dance refuses to be couched in the terms of any one style, despite being so strongly rooted in those styles. In just a few short solos, here’s what we are given: hip hop grooves, micro-isolations (reminding me so much of the techniques of animation); flirting with house footwork here and there; seamless transitions between dancing up-top and on the floor, likely inspired by the recent surge of contemporary-influenced floorwork among house dancers; a focused gaze toward the corner spotlight or eyes darting along the large hall of readymade. These, and so much more, made Dechen’s performance a highlight.

This piece was split into a few vignettes, the first with poet Genevieve Craig, the middle two solos by Dechen and Genevieve respectively, with Genevieve utilising her background in slam poetry, then another solo by Dechen that culminates in her moving, trance-like, to her collaborator’s poetry. With such a short amount of time, the switch between vignettes was abrupt, and it became difficult to feel into the connection between Geneveive’s lines and Dechen’s movement. Perhaps it was a difference of scale. Craig boldly uses many broad, hard-to-define concepts: peace, culture, history, justice and, of course, truth, the latter repeated multiple times to close the act. But how exactly do these terms relate to the idiosyncrasies of Dechen’s performance, the very idiosyncrasies that made her freestyle so enchanting? How exactly do these terms—peace, culture, history, and so on—relate to each other? What is the symbolic potential of truth here, and how does it animate what Dechen has accomplished in her dance? The textuality of dance and the dance of language are intersections that can furnish a life’s worth of work; and how truth can be expressed in a dance piece is another, related question. I look forward to seeing how Dechen and Genevieve can continue to inhabit those connections together.

The second performance, by Patrick “Preemo P” Huynh and his collaborators, in many ways peers into the truth of breaking. The form is rigorous, unforgiving; breakers can be siphoned off from the rest of the world, somewhat unique in their blend of creative, athletic and technical obsessions; mentors can be ruthless (sometimes problematically so), their respect for the artform outweighing the kindness afforded to a newbie. For better or worse, this is how skilled breakers have been made.

The work begins from the perspective of Leon Endo (Bboy Leon) the youngest of the group, as he struggles to follow his elder, Preemo P—sloppy footwork, crashes, poor transitions. Preemo and Leon eventually start to exchange rounds. Their talents are quickly revealed. Preemo’s top rocks are earthy yet effortless; he's fond of sweeps, tracing a semi-circle with the off leg; and a well-placed arm—on his leg, on his face—gives his dance a little extra flair. Leon, by contrast, utilises power moves done slowly; his growth from rookie to seasoned is highlighted. This all happens over some lo-fi beats, with lush piano chords and ethereal strings. Later, two more breakers join in: Takuma Takemesa, better known as Bob CC, whose elegant and graceful footwork was a highline; and Jeremy Iskander aka Faldeeze, a forceful breaker dressed in all black. Faldeeze continually antagonises the other breakers, pushing them, pulling at their leg to force a crash. Unfortunately, this presence as a force of antagonism went a little underexplored. Perhaps breaking is being likened to a fight, or even chess (Wu Tang's Intro to Shadowboxin'—"the game of chess, is like a sword fight"—is the opener to one of the group’s sequences)? I found this connection between breaking and other, similarly unforgiving art-forms to be curious and compelling—more so than Leon’s coming-of-age story, which at times felt like a forced narrative imposition to get the work going. This group I think have an ability to explore and communicate the darker sides of creative discipline, the psychic costs of training at the highest level (a level this crew has so much experience with). This shadow element of discipline was a subtle presence throughout their show—bringing it to the fore, making it more explicit, could be immensely generative.

Power and vulnerability are the subjects of Momoka Nogita’s piece, performed in collaboration with Vincent Kyle Garcia. This third offering begins with voice over interviews, each dancer taking their turn to respond to the same set of questions: What does power mean to you? If you had all the power in the world, what would you do? At what moments in your life did you feel vulnerable? What can be achieved through vulnerability? On a chair in the centre of the stage, Momo and Vincent dance to their responses, their gestures often a literal translation of what’s being said.

The interview responses are at times whimsical, at times serious, and at times a subtle glimpse into the dancers’ interiority. But the interviews and their inclusion sometimes fell flat. Again, when broad, all-encompassing concepts like power and vulnerability come into play, it becomes difficult to feel into what’s being said. In performances of this length it’s a risk to rely on lofty concepts, hoping the audience will know what you’re referring to. Perhaps by altering the scope of questions, or by cutting down the number of questions to be answered, or even by expanding this into a longer piece, Vincent and Momo could genuinely and effectively make their talk just as evocative as their dance.

And how evocative their dance! With a brief break over a hot drink, where Momo and Vincent chat quietly, maybe discussing their responses, Donna Summer's ‘Melody of Love’ kicks in. It's a party, and these waackers get to replicate Summer's gorgeous lyrics and silky voice with grace, poise and, of course, power. The dancers split apart and come together again, freestyling on their own and eventually connecting for a brief and hard-hitting choreography. Their waacking technique is undeniable: fast, clean, and sharp stops; beautiful circles traced with their forearms by hinging at the elbow; playing effortlessly with their arms overhead. Vincent has a penchant for level changes and struts across the space, and Momo is graceful in the way she melts before springing back to life. The two harmonise beautifully.

There’s a way that the closing act, offered by Valdi Yudibrata and collaborator William Mak, is also a meditation on power. But here it’s more explicitly the power of belonging to a tradition, be it by blood or by association. Though not from West Sumatra specifically (his background is Sundanese), Valdi’s power is ancestral; his voice quiets the room, alters its feel. Rhythms he’s picked up from the body percussion of Randai become a sonic articulation of that power. Technically speaking these rhythms mix well with the two dancers’ backgrounds in krump and popping, as both styles are uncompromising in their use of muscle contractions, sharp and sudden expressions of strength, and quick changes in velocity. You can use your pop to show a rhythm; you can create a rhythm with your stomp and jab. Will and Valdi explore this with maturity, allowing the play on rhythm and style enough time and space to breathe. All this mirroring is enacted at the level of costume, too. Valdi’s Destar—a patterned fabric that he would later tie around his waist—becomes the centrepoint around which the two dancers revolve: copying each other’s movements, finding their own unique expression while connecting with the other—Will does this in Nikes, Valdi without shoes. It’s hard not to experience the Destar’s centring as symbolic, for attention is continually drawn to Valdi’s expression in and through Randai. How Will can enhance this symbolism without detracting from his own voice, history, and movement is something I think still needs working out. Why, for example, is this not a solo act? (This is not at all to say that it should be a solo act, but that, in asking the question and others like it, Will and Valdi can make good on the collaborative potential they very clearly exhibit).

Krump, Will and Valdi’s shared language, finishes the show. While every dance style is communal, insofar as it involves some kind of shared set of movements or worldviews, krump is almost never a solo act. Krump needs hype. Krump feeds off energy. Will and Valdi bring their intense and impactful play on rhythms, claps, pops and stomps to a head when a krump remix of Kendrick Lamar’s (by now overplayed, surely?) ‘Not Like Us’ comes in. Every krumper in the room had a chance to jump on stage and get off, audience and performers alike, and the cheers, the hype, was infectious. Readymade was witness to how krump effortlessly collapses regimented separations between performer and audience, and therefore how important the embodied presence of the audience actually is. Even if you’re not performing, street dance teaches us, you have the agency and therefore responsibility to alter the energetics of the space.

It’s a testament to Gabriela’s curation that she chose to end with Will and Valdi. For by the end, at the zenith of hype and volume and energy, it seemed that everyone—the performers, with their irreducibly different skillsets and backgrounds; and the audience, coming with their own histories and expertise; both, with almost nothing left to give—deserved an applause. Exhausting yes, imperfect always, but in a gathering of street dancers there’s always room for magic.

__________

HAPPY HOUR #19

ReadyMade Works, Ultimo, 5th & 6th April, 2025

Guest Curator: Gabriela Quinsacara:

Performers:

Dechen Gendun with Genevieve Craig  

Patrick Huynh with Leon Endo, Takuma Takemesa, and Jeremy Iskander

Momoka Nogita with Vincent Kyle Garcia

Valdi Yudibrata with William Mak

Tech: Sarah Stormont

ReadyMade Works: Director Jane McKernan, Studio Manager Ashleigh Veitch, Communications Manager Chanel Cheung.

Happy Hour is ReadyMade Works’ signature short works program showcasing the practices of Sydney’s independent dance artists. Initiated by Linda Luke and Samantha Chester in 2016, Happy Hour is the platform for encountering the diverse and uncompromising work being made by local dance artists.”

__________

Zain El-Roubaei is a dancer and graduate student @ USYD. Contact: zain.elroubaei@gmail.com

Phaedra Brown on High Octane

HIGH OCTANE: A RELENTLESS PUSH TO THE START LINE

Campbelltown Arts Centre, 28th March, 2025

Emma Harrison: director and performer with performer/collaborators Emma Riches & Frances Orlina               

review by Phaedra Brown

Racing helmets, leaf-blowers, and smoke machines galore—Emma Harrison’s High Octane melds evocative staging and seamlessly executed choreography to explore our experience of competition, success and above all, resilience. It’s a work that pushes relentlessly forward but takes the audience along for the ride.

Entering Campbelltown Arts Centre we were met with remnants of last night’s burnout on the forecourt. Others have told me it was pretty spectacular, a shame to have missed the wheel spinning, tire squealing, smoky display of rev-head action on the 2nd and 3rd nights of this characteristically short contemporary dance season. But when we entered the foyer our compensation was the sound of formula one racing commentary playing over a loudspeaker, setting up the world of High Octane before we even got to the performance space, a fun detail.

As we enter the black box theatre the stage is doused in smoke. The dancers are amping themselves up. Models, drivers, rock-stars and wrestlers, they shift hazily between modes of competition, celebrity and stardom. Dressed in Eliza Cooper’s fitting mix of Lycra and leather, the three performers—Emma Harrison, Emma Riches and Frances Orlina—look great in cropped racing jackets over form fitting body suits, with motorbike helmets which they use as head coverings, podiums, shields and trophies throughout the work.

Emma Harrison’s choreography alternates between big, jazzy, rhythmic sequences, and oozy, curling slow-motion sections. There are major unison sections which are interjected with each of the dancers, at different moments, taking the lead or trailing the pack, keeping the cycle of ‘leader’ or ‘winner’ rotating between the three. This piqued my interest over and over again as I was always wondering who would rise to the top next.

With High Octane, as with her solo work Wolverine in 2024 (Sydney Festival), Emma Harrison has created seamless transitions between movement and text, crafting stories that complement the movement without being overly explanatory. With High Octane we hear monologues from Frances Orlina about her lust for stardom delivered while balancing precariously atop her racing helmet. From Harrison we get a frenzied take on a regional dance Eisteddfod, a call-back to her childhood. And in a section steeped in early 2000s nostalgia, Emma Riches excitedly recites a series of numbers, the numerical patterns of texts delivered via an early mobile keypad to a high-school boyfriend. Her quick, neat, detailed movement transforms into a series of proud poses. She has it all: mobile phone, love, and the promise of a bright future. She’s the top of the high-school food chain. Riches is impressive with in her precise mix of voice and movement, expertly toeing a line between the earnest and the satirical.

The props and other production elements of High Octane are impressive as well. A leaf blower becomes a wind machine that’s so forceful it distorts the dancers’ faces; motorbike helmets are symbols of strength, success and power, paraded around the stage, held high as if a conqueror is offering up enemy heads. A pile of ash rests in the back corner for the duration of the work, a fourth, vanquished competitor.

The neon greens, pinks and reds, with the re-occurring use of spotlights in Benjamin Brockman’s lighting design both expose the dancers and transform them into icons. The electronic sound design by Amy Flannery drives the dancers forward, inspiring and matching their persistence. The cleverly integrated sounds of a racetrack or a dial tone help build the world of the show.

Sound is a rich element in all aspects of this work. After a helmet clad headbutting battle, Riches is left defeated. She begins to wail. Harrison then Orlina join, their cries unexpectedly transforming into the sound of cars revving—an inspired moment. The performers’ voices become tires screeching, sirens blaring, a harrowing soundscape. The dancers disappear and reappear, in and out of smoke, as they struggle to press towards the front corner of the stage, making ground and then being pulled back into the fog. Harrison delivers a balletic yet very rock-and-roll solo. There are victory laps, purposeful posing from the others, first place eisteddfod solos and those earlier wrestlers and rock-stars return. Through intense strobing light the movement echoes the start of the work, this time with more attack and clarity, the dancers now mid-competition.

Finally, Emma, Emma and Frances collapse into their separate spotlights, alongside the pile of ashes. A sense of aftershock settles across the stage. Emma Harrison begins to sing, rallying herself and the others. They begin a broken resurrection. Their bodies rising and collapsing. A jagged and broken roll begins over to the pile of ashes. Grabbing, hoarding, and pulling the ash with their arms, legs and bellies, they spread it out across the white stage. The ash becomes asphalt as the dancers mark out a large oval, a racetrack; their bodies struggling to pave the track and out of the ashes a new start line emerges.

Emma Harrison, Emma Riches and Frances Orlina are a well-oiled machine in High Octane, a work that never quite breaks down or reaches its limit. At times we see exhaustion built into the movement, but we never fear that they will fail or push past the point of no return. The work never becomes so high octane that the movement itself is unsustainable, but it does point to a relentless need for all of us to be ‘on’. The competition is not a fight to the death, but a fight to stay in motion—to do it all and ‘have it all’.  

The team behind High Octane have created a work with access points for all audiences.  Harrison, Riches, Orlina, Brockman, Flannery, and Cooper have produced a great example of how production and performance can work together to create an engaging piece of contemporary dance—a form often accused of being inaccessible. As Harrison explains, High Octane “is garish and loud, it moves fast and doesn’t wait for you to catch up”, but I never felt left behind. In a work that required model-like poise, gritty floorwork and nuanced characterisation, the versatility and staying power of all the performers is to be applauded; as are the team at Campbelltown Arts Centre who continue to champion and present high-quality, independent, contemporary dance work in Sydney.

__________

HIGH OCTANE

Campbelltown Arts Centre, March 27-29, 2025

Director and Performer: Emma Harrison

Performer and Collaborator: Emma Riches

Performer and Collaborator: Frances Orlina

Lighting Designer: Benjamin Brockman

Sound Designer: Amy Flannery

Costume Designer: Eliza Cooper

Dramaturg: Adriane Daff

Outside Eye: Martin del Amo and Miranda Wheen

Understudy: Cassidy McDermott Smith

Production Manager: Jessica Pizzinga

Operator: Darcy Catto-Pitkin

Creative Producer: Anthea Doropoulos

Assistant Creative Producer: Anne Cutajar

__________

Phaedra Brown is an independent dancer, choreographer, and producer. Her current practice draws on a collage of elements from movement, choreography, writing, and curation.

Lexy Panetta on Love Arena

LOVE ARENA a captivating exploration of rhythm and organic forms

Remy Rochester & Jasmin Luna: concept, choreography and performers

Sydney Fringe Festival, Sydney Dance Company Neilson Studio, 28th September, 2024.

review by Lexy Panetta

Sydney based artists Jasmin Luna and Remy Rochester offered a fascinating exploration of rhythm and nature in their new contemporary dance duet Love Arena. The work left me hypnotised with its continual outpouring of energy, textured synchronicity and intricate detail.

Love Arena reflects the cyclical nature of our inner and outer worlds through an exploration of tension and resolve. The program notes declare the works exploration of ecological themes, specifically addressing “human symmetry with the natural environments”, which evidently reflected on the performers' (re)connection to organic harmony and rhythm. From the outset, Love Arena explores these themes through organic movement and attention to the embodiment of the subtle, harmonious rhythms of the Alyx Denison score, with which the dancers resonate and predict, preempt and follow. The symmetry of the score is also reflected in the choreography with its attention to dual patterns, not only in the fact that this is a duet, but also through the compositional choices that blur the lines between who is affecting who—the body of the other, one’s own body or the ‘body’ of the environment.

The work is called Love Arena because it refers to the proximity of two beings and their interdependence of energy, resonance, and rhythm within a shared space. The choreography reflects this through a variety of movement and spatial choices that evidence a call and affect resonance and symmetry, demonstrating a captivating exploration of rhythm and organic forms.

Love Arena’s design is minimalist. The stage is firstly set in a dull glow, making the dancers only just visible as they make small actions lying on the floor.  They nestle on their backs with their knees bent upwards to fit within the base of a cylindrical, draping net structure that cascades from the ceiling. The structure recalled a tree for me, a soft pillar in the centre of the stage with a texture of veins, evoking the softness of many organic forms.

The dancers unfurl, imitating the roots of this tree. The pulsating overhead lighting changes the design from dark low lighting to a warm glow, accompanied by a surging synth Dennison’s score, which signals to the dancers’ to evolve into their next state.

Here their movements synchronise, they are intricate, unfurling actions that move the dancers out from within their tree trunk into a pulsating light and soundscape. This alert   section felt like watching an organism change within a time-lapse of day and night.

Costumes in Love Arena were minimal, with warm and earthy toned trousers and a net textured fabric providing transparent coverage for the dancers’ upper bodies, it reminded me of moss. As the sleeves draped their arms, the costumes offered an organic continuation of their movements throughout the work, providing another visual element that complicated and obscured the silhouette of their human-organic forms.

The performers seemed engrossed by one another and began to expand out from the central prop, working as one unit, filling the voids of each other’s negative space. They moved with a combination of rippling energy and staccato pauses, shifting the physical reactions as they interplayed with one another’s positioning; either being affected by the other or relocating to replace the others shape in the space. The choreography tessellates through space, the dancers still engrossed in one another’s forms, shifting and collecting each other’s energy – again… it was difficult to discern who or what was being affected or doing the affecting.

After exploring the stage, tracing the rhythms of one another’s movements, they trailed off into individual explorations of those rhythms, interspersed with subtle synchronised sections. They minimise their movements, reduce their speed, retract back towards the netted trunk. They vibrate and surge back to their starting position, reflecting the completion of the cycle of their organic, rhythmic journey.

Whilst I think it would have been effective to see a more purposeful incorporation of the prop suspended from the ceiling, Remy Rochester & Jasmin Luna have created a strong work that encompasses an organic build using mirroring, rhythmical shifts and moments of unison. It would be great to see Love Arena offered the chance for further development, expanding on its founding concepts and extending it from its current short running time of 25 minutes. There was obviously a clear commitment in Love Arena from both performer/choreographers to maintain a steady intention in the work: the interplay of rhythm through which they sought to explore the cadences of each other, echoing from one body to another body, and from each to their environment and back again. It was a captivating work and demonstrated the potential of these two young choreographers. I hope they get other chances to show us what they can do.

__________

LOVE ARENA

Sydney Fringe Festival, Dance Hub, Sydney Dance Company Neilson Studio, 26-28 September 2024

Remy Rochester & Jasmin Luna: concept, choreography and performers

Composer: Alyx Dennison

Costumes and Set Design: Jasmin Luna

Lighting Designer: Saint Clair

Mentor: Kristina Chan

Supported by: Catapult Choreographic Hub, Legs on the Wall, Create NSW, Critical Path, Dance Makers Collective, Sydney Fringe Festival, and Sydney Dance Company.

__________

Alexandria (Lexy) Panetta is a Sydney-based independent artist, choreographer, and academic with interest in dance performance, improvisation, choreography, and film. Lexy also works part-time as a tutor at the Australian College of Physical Education (ACPE), is the Learning Associate for the Sydney Dance Company (SDC), and tours as a Teaching Artist for SDC.

Sarah Kalule on Plagiary

PLAGIARY an ambitious exploration of AI-integrated dance

Alisdair Macindoe: concept, direction, choreography, text, coding, sound design and set design

Sydney Opera House, Unwrapped Festival, 14th September 2024

reviewed by Sarah Kalule

Dimly lit dancers prepared behind a black scrim for the matinee of Plagiary, choreographed by Alisdair Macindoe, at Sydney Opera House’s Studio. Amongst them, a colourful array of clothes were lined up on racks as they dressed in mismatched outfits, finishing their costume with name-tagged bibs. Through projected captions and a robotic voice over, the audience was informed about the performance, including the option for participatory play—we received polarised glasses that blocked out the projections and the scrim stage wings. The grand gimmick was also revealed through the captions and voice: the performance was generated from randomised AI prompts that appeared on the screen as text throughout and was also fed to the dancers via their wireless earpieces. However, some ideas can only go so far, and here, for me, the concept outshone the work.

There were impressive concepts of plagiarism and autonomy shaping Plagiary. Responding to descriptive and action-based prompts, such as “walk onto the stage” and “traverse like gods”, the ten dancers floated and flickered across the stage, occasionally retreating behind the scrim. Their dancing was clearly experimental, carefully considered, and built upon technical contemporary dance skills. They displayed robust commitment as they transitioned through one postural phrase to the next in line with the AI’s fast paced commands, blurring the lines between self-initiative and AI responsive movement. However, ten minutes in, momentum plateaued. The work revealed its overall theme too early leaving little room for evolution. Perhaps this was an intentional decision, feeding into the idea of AI as a novice compared to human intelligence. The AI did prompt exciting sub-themes including AI-generated images, tales and interviews, however the lack of contrast and change as the performance evolved induced feelings of indifference. Even the performers’ ethereal gazes reflected their disconnect, making the work feel like a haphazard rehearsal. Had the AI fed the performers more risk-taking tasks, such as performing between states of compliance and rebellion, it might have made an impactful contrast. Nonetheless, the sameness of the prompts paved the way for the performers’ ability to make original choices. At times they were given the same task, but each unique take further affirmed their independence from the AI. While the overall theme was revealed too soon, these responses to tasks opened up a platform to query AI’s role in the performing arts, demonstrating the human choreographer as far more creative and capable in making performance.

The most compelling section of the work was a numbers game, where the dancers chose a number between one and five and moved when the AI called their number. With the prompt, “drop suddenly to the floor when you hear your number, then slowly rise”, their popcorn-like, explosive response brewed up an exciting anticipation. The audience did not know when the dancers would strike, offering a dynamic surprise as their movement was now unpredictable. Not only did this allow a contrasting moment in comparison to the force-fed prompts, this game was also an effective demonstration of flexible boundaries. It was a moment where AI and performers were working together and were dependent upon each other. Rather than having the AI set rigid frameworks, this numbers game set a foundational framework of performing a specific movement alongside the flexibility for the dancers to choose when to perform the movement, bringing the performers together as a harmonious ensemble. By working with the AI in this way, this further underscores the narrative of who’s in control—whether that be the AI or the performers.

In most cases, Macindoe positioned the AI as the dominant figure, but I question the sustainability of critiquing AI while leaning so heavily on it, if this was indeed his aim. Since AI lacks autonomy or desire, the effect of a controlling force feels inauthentic because it was really Macindoe orchestrating the initial ideas. The text prompts, ambient music and apocalyptic computer graphics, without deeper development, made the overall concept of the work feel awkward and emotionally flat.

While there were a couple of culturally diverse performers, the lack of equal representation limited the work’s depth. People from all walks of life have encountered AI, and an equal range of ages, body types, and dance experience would have enriched the interpretations, potentially further reflecting the diversity of unique perspectives.

Macindoe's Plagiary excels in initiating innovative performance ideas that interact with emerging technologies. Choreographically, there are compelling elements of body ownership where the performers’ decisions to enter or leave the stage contributed to a reclaiming of art affected by technology’s role in plagiarism. Performers Joel Fenton and Siobhan Lynch stood out as a hilarious and engaging duo in their impromptu interview, in which they recited the AI’s nonsensical tales. The ensemble was undoubtedly talented, displaying flair and commitment. The set design was a highlight, using playful light and shade effects with polarised glasses.

Though this Sydney premiere season was short, I would hope to see more development of Plagiary. Employing emerging technologies offers a gateway to explore untapped possibilities. However, when the excitement of AI fades, what makes the performance worth staying for? Answering this is crucial to prolonging momentum.

Plagiary is an ambitious and experimental exploration of AI-integrated dance, and with further development, it has the potential to succeed beyond using new technology as mere novelty.

PLAGIARY

Sydney Opera House, Unwrapped Festival, 12-14 September 2024

Alisdair Macindoe: concept, direction, choreography, text, coding, sound design and set design

Performers: Sam Beazley, Franky Drouisoti, Joel Fenton, Josh Freedman, Allie Graham, Tara Hodge, Grace Lewis, Siobhan Lynch, Frances Orlina, Sam Osborn

Video design, image design, coding: Sam Mcgilp

Software Development, Head Coder: Chris Chua

Costume Design, Prop Design: Andrew Treloar

Lighting Design: Amelia Lever-Davidson

Production Management: Zsuzsa Gaynor Mahaly

Producer: Penelope Leishman (Insite Arts)

Sarah Kalule is an artist exploring choreography, literature and experimental performance. With a strong interest in contemporary art theory, her current practice delves into her diasporic histories, theatrical jazz and presenting the body in space through bold imagery.

Erin Brannigan introduces Dancing Sydney Review Platform

Dancing Sydney Review Platform seeks to make a small contribution to addressing a lack of critical discourse, both now and historically, that would even begin to approach the published literature surrounding Australian visual art, music and theatre. Creative excellence requires dialogue with a community that is engaged, informed and committed. With space for arts reviews in major outlets slimmer than ever before, and a tradition of underwhelming or downright negligent publishing when it comes to dance criticism in this country, we need fresh strategies for gaining critical ground for Australian contemporary dance.

The already beleaguered artistic community involved in contemporary dance development and production in Australia might not survive one more widely read, but poorly informed critic. Yes, everyone's entitled to their opinion, but where is the equity in appointing expert commentators in our major papers across the visual arts, literature, theatre and dance who have an appropriate level of knowledge and care and can produce informed, well-written, and productively critical articles?

One example of this inequity is a recent review of INDance at Sydney Dance Company published in the SMH August 23, 2024. The critic opens with a wholesale damning of the field that amplifies the misconceptions and prejudices that the art form has been dogged by for many decades:

Modern dance cliches – the bad ones – often involve shapeless bags, near-darkness, long periods of repetitive or very slow movement and superfluous nudity. Perhaps this is why modern dance is sometimes unfairly labelled as self-indulgent or inaccessible.

Such repetitions of outdated clichés set us back yet again as we work to attract audiences to this artform through informed discourse. The sensationalist tone of this review is in line with ‘shock-jock tactics’: attempts to win reader attention at the expense of reviewing excellence. This is an extremely outdated and unethical mode, unworthy of publication in any self-respecting outlet.

Who evaluates the critic? Who has gained the stripes to translate Australian Contemporary Dance for broader audiences, an art form that has its references in international, cutting-edge practices, and the broader contemporary arts? Visual art criticism in this country has boasted giants such as Robert Hughes, controversial voices such as John McDonald, and a new generation of artist-critics such as Lisa Radford and Neha Kale. Literary criticism has had artist-critics such as Patrick White and Drusilla Modjeska as well as new voices Jeanine Leane, Cher Tan and Prithvi Varatharajan. Theatre has had the brilliant James Waites, Alison Croggan and my colleague at UNSW, John McCallum. Music has Andrew Ford and the brilliant Robert Forster.

Why is contemporary dance consistently shuffled into the 'too hard' basket? Where is the editorial duty-of-care? What attempts are made to research the best candidate for this work? RealTime arts journal did so much to build serious critical dialogue around dance, with an impressive roll call of top-notch writers; Eleanor Brickhill, Philippa Rothfield, and Andrew Fuhrmann. Justine Shih Pearson has published some excellent reviews in The Conversation, and Vicki Van Hout’s review blog for FORM Dance Projects (2013-) in Sydney provides crucial archives of works that may not have been covered anywhere else.

Dancing Sydney Review Platform is supported by local dance writers and scholars who see dance criticism as an essential part of any healthy dance ecology. In supporting new and emerging writers through editorial support and guidance, we hope to sow some seeds for future quality writings on dance.

Erin Brannigan