Zain El-Roubaei on Happy Hour #19

HAPPY HOUR #19: The Many Pockets of Sydney Street Dance

Gabriela Quinsacara: Guest Curator

ReadyMade Works, Ultimo, 5th & 6th April, 2025

Performances by:

Dechen Gendun with Genevieve Craig  

Patrick Huynh with Leon Endo, Takuma Takemesa, and Jeremy Iskander

Momoka Nogita with Vincent Kyle Garcia

Valdi Yudibrata with William Mak

review by Zain El-Roubaei

I got to watch ReadyMade’s Happy Hour #19 twice, both nights on a warm weekend in April, and it taught me that street dancers are generous witnesses. The show was an incursion of a sort, maybe even an infiltration of street dancers into ReadyMade's quarters, with its black floors always generating slightly too much heat, its wooden balcony terrace, a table donned with fruits for free, beer and wine for purchase, its lines for a bathroom tucked away in the corner, and its capacity to generate sweet conversation. Expanding what is meant by the ‘contemporary’ in dance, director Jane McKernan has made street styles a regular fixture at Happy Hour; in fact, six of the last eleven have involved street dancers. But during this one, Happy Hour #19, I understood something that felt true in my bones. I wrote it down: street dance is a gathering. One could say instead that street dance unifies, but I think that implies we are all similar and united among a shared vision. It’s not that. No, unify is too loaded a term: street dance does not unify; it gathers.

Gabriela Quinsacara curated this season’s Happy Hour, and it’s hard to imagine a better fit: her experience with various street styles—and more importantly, her experience with various street dancers—is extensive. This is someone who has danced, judged, taught, cyphered and shared with many pockets of the Australian dance scene. This is someone who has been a core part of the Sydney street dance crew Riddim Nation, a group that, among eight members, covers pretty much every street style—from waacking to breaking, from hip hop to Afrohouse and vogue femme, from popping to dancehall, extending even as far as headbanging and ska. Gabriela’s rigorous eclecticism, a playful traversing across street dance cultures at the highest level, is mirrored in her curation. We got to see Dechen Gendun, Sydney’s house & hip hop veteran; Patrick “Preemo P” Huynh, an explosive, unique and charismatic breaker; Momoka Nogita (Momo), a waacker relentless in refining her approach to her style and the stage; and Valdi Yudibrata, carrying within him a near-intimidating blend of krump, popping, choreography, and Randai, a dance from the Minangkabau people of West Sumatra.

In the first of these four mini-performances Dechen Gendun collaborated with Genevieve Craig. What shines immediately is Dechen’s detail, poise, subtlety; and it seems her dance refuses to be couched in the terms of any one style, despite being so strongly rooted in those styles. In just a few short solos, here’s what we are given: hip hop grooves, micro-isolations (reminding me so much of the techniques of animation); flirting with house footwork here and there; seamless transitions between dancing up-top and on the floor, likely inspired by the recent surge of contemporary-influenced floorwork among house dancers; a focused gaze toward the corner spotlight or eyes darting along the large hall of readymade. These, and so much more, made Dechen’s performance a highlight.

This piece was split into a few vignettes, the first with poet Genevieve Craig, the middle two solos by Dechen and Genevieve respectively, with Genevieve utilising her background in slam poetry, then another solo by Dechen that culminates in her moving, trance-like, to her collaborator’s poetry. With such a short amount of time, the switch between vignettes was abrupt, and it became difficult to feel into the connection between Geneveive’s lines and Dechen’s movement. Perhaps it was a difference of scale. Craig boldly uses many broad, hard-to-define concepts: peace, culture, history, justice and, of course, truth, the latter repeated multiple times to close the act. But how exactly do these terms relate to the idiosyncrasies of Dechen’s performance, the very idiosyncrasies that made her freestyle so enchanting? How exactly do these terms—peace, culture, history, and so on—relate to each other? What is the symbolic potential of truth here, and how does it animate what Dechen has accomplished in her dance? The textuality of dance and the dance of language are intersections that can furnish a life’s worth of work; and how truth can be expressed in a dance piece is another, related question. I look forward to seeing how Dechen and Genevieve can continue to inhabit those connections together.

The second performance, by Patrick “Preemo P” Huynh and his collaborators, in many ways peers into the truth of breaking. The form is rigorous, unforgiving; breakers can be siphoned off from the rest of the world, somewhat unique in their blend of creative, athletic and technical obsessions; mentors can be ruthless (sometimes problematically so), their respect for the artform outweighing the kindness afforded to a newbie. For better or worse, this is how skilled breakers have been made.

The work begins from the perspective of Leon Endo (Bboy Leon) the youngest of the group, as he struggles to follow his elder, Preemo P—sloppy footwork, crashes, poor transitions. Preemo and Leon eventually start to exchange rounds. Their talents are quickly revealed. Preemo’s top rocks are earthy yet effortless; he's fond of sweeps, tracing a semi-circle with the off leg; and a well-placed arm—on his leg, on his face—gives his dance a little extra flair. Leon, by contrast, utilises power moves done slowly; his growth from rookie to seasoned is highlighted. This all happens over some lo-fi beats, with lush piano chords and ethereal strings. Later, two more breakers join in: Takuma Takemesa, better known as Bob CC, whose elegant and graceful footwork was a highline; and Jeremy Iskander aka Faldeeze, a forceful breaker dressed in all black. Faldeeze continually antagonises the other breakers, pushing them, pulling at their leg to force a crash. Unfortunately, this presence as a force of antagonism went a little underexplored. Perhaps breaking is being likened to a fight, or even chess (Wu Tang's Intro to Shadowboxin'—"the game of chess, is like a sword fight"—is the opener to one of the group’s sequences)? I found this connection between breaking and other, similarly unforgiving art-forms to be curious and compelling—more so than Leon’s coming-of-age story, which at times felt like a forced narrative imposition to get the work going. This group I think have an ability to explore and communicate the darker sides of creative discipline, the psychic costs of training at the highest level (a level this crew has so much experience with). This shadow element of discipline was a subtle presence throughout their show—bringing it to the fore, making it more explicit, could be immensely generative.

Power and vulnerability are the subjects of Momoka Nogita’s piece, performed in collaboration with Vincent Kyle Garcia. This third offering begins with voice over interviews, each dancer taking their turn to respond to the same set of questions: What does power mean to you? If you had all the power in the world, what would you do? At what moments in your life did you feel vulnerable? What can be achieved through vulnerability? On a chair in the centre of the stage, Momo and Vincent dance to their responses, their gestures often a literal translation of what’s being said.

The interview responses are at times whimsical, at times serious, and at times a subtle glimpse into the dancers’ interiority. But the interviews and their inclusion sometimes fell flat. Again, when broad, all-encompassing concepts like power and vulnerability come into play, it becomes difficult to feel into what’s being said. In performances of this length it’s a risk to rely on lofty concepts, hoping the audience will know what you’re referring to. Perhaps by altering the scope of questions, or by cutting down the number of questions to be answered, or even by expanding this into a longer piece, Vincent and Momo could genuinely and effectively make their talk just as evocative as their dance.

And how evocative their dance! With a brief break over a hot drink, where Momo and Vincent chat quietly, maybe discussing their responses, Donna Summer's ‘Melody of Love’ kicks in. It's a party, and these waackers get to replicate Summer's gorgeous lyrics and silky voice with grace, poise and, of course, power. The dancers split apart and come together again, freestyling on their own and eventually connecting for a brief and hard-hitting choreography. Their waacking technique is undeniable: fast, clean, and sharp stops; beautiful circles traced with their forearms by hinging at the elbow; playing effortlessly with their arms overhead. Vincent has a penchant for level changes and struts across the space, and Momo is graceful in the way she melts before springing back to life. The two harmonise beautifully.

There’s a way that the closing act, offered by Valdi Yudibrata and collaborator William Mak, is also a meditation on power. But here it’s more explicitly the power of belonging to a tradition, be it by blood or by association. Though not from West Sumatra specifically (his background is Sundanese), Valdi’s power is ancestral; his voice quiets the room, alters its feel. Rhythms he’s picked up from the body percussion of Randai become a sonic articulation of that power. Technically speaking these rhythms mix well with the two dancers’ backgrounds in krump and popping, as both styles are uncompromising in their use of muscle contractions, sharp and sudden expressions of strength, and quick changes in velocity. You can use your pop to show a rhythm; you can create a rhythm with your stomp and jab. Will and Valdi explore this with maturity, allowing the play on rhythm and style enough time and space to breathe. All this mirroring is enacted at the level of costume, too. Valdi’s Destar—a patterned fabric that he would later tie around his waist—becomes the centrepoint around which the two dancers revolve: copying each other’s movements, finding their own unique expression while connecting with the other—Will does this in Nikes, Valdi without shoes. It’s hard not to experience the Destar’s centring as symbolic, for attention is continually drawn to Valdi’s expression in and through Randai. How Will can enhance this symbolism without detracting from his own voice, history, and movement is something I think still needs working out. Why, for example, is this not a solo act? (This is not at all to say that it should be a solo act, but that, in asking the question and others like it, Will and Valdi can make good on the collaborative potential they very clearly exhibit).

Krump, Will and Valdi’s shared language, finishes the show. While every dance style is communal, insofar as it involves some kind of shared set of movements or worldviews, krump is almost never a solo act. Krump needs hype. Krump feeds off energy. Will and Valdi bring their intense and impactful play on rhythms, claps, pops and stomps to a head when a krump remix of Kendrick Lamar’s (by now overplayed, surely?) ‘Not Like Us’ comes in. Every krumper in the room had a chance to jump on stage and get off, audience and performers alike, and the cheers, the hype, was infectious. Readymade was witness to how krump effortlessly collapses regimented separations between performer and audience, and therefore how important the embodied presence of the audience actually is. Even if you’re not performing, street dance teaches us, you have the agency and therefore responsibility to alter the energetics of the space.

It’s a testament to Gabriela’s curation that she chose to end with Will and Valdi. For by the end, at the zenith of hype and volume and energy, it seemed that everyone—the performers, with their irreducibly different skillsets and backgrounds; and the audience, coming with their own histories and expertise; both, with almost nothing left to give—deserved an applause. Exhausting yes, imperfect always, but in a gathering of street dancers there’s always room for magic.

__________

HAPPY HOUR #19

ReadyMade Works, Ultimo, 5th & 6th April, 2025

Guest Curator: Gabriela Quinsacara:

Performers:

Dechen Gendun with Genevieve Craig  

Patrick Huynh with Leon Endo, Takuma Takemesa, and Jeremy Iskander

Momoka Nogita with Vincent Kyle Garcia

Valdi Yudibrata with William Mak

Tech: Sarah Stormont

ReadyMade Works: Director Jane McKernan, Studio Manager Ashleigh Veitch, Communications Manager Chanel Cheung.

Happy Hour is ReadyMade Works’ signature short works program showcasing the practices of Sydney’s independent dance artists. Initiated by Linda Luke and Samantha Chester in 2016, Happy Hour is the platform for encountering the diverse and uncompromising work being made by local dance artists.”

__________

Zain El-Roubaei is a dancer and graduate student @ USYD. Contact: zain.elroubaei@gmail.com

Phaedra Brown on High Octane

HIGH OCTANE: A RELENTLESS PUSH TO THE START LINE

Campbelltown Arts Centre, 28th March, 2025

Emma Harrison: director and performer with performer/collaborators Emma Riches & Frances Orlina               

review by Phaedra Brown

Racing helmets, leaf-blowers, and smoke machines galore—Emma Harrison’s High Octane melds evocative staging and seamlessly executed choreography to explore our experience of competition, success and above all, resilience. It’s a work that pushes relentlessly forward but takes the audience along for the ride.

Entering Campbelltown Arts Centre we were met with remnants of last night’s burnout on the forecourt. Others have told me it was pretty spectacular, a shame to have missed the wheel spinning, tire squealing, smoky display of rev-head action on the 2nd and 3rd nights of this characteristically short contemporary dance season. But when we entered the foyer our compensation was the sound of formula one racing commentary playing over a loudspeaker, setting up the world of High Octane before we even got to the performance space, a fun detail.

As we enter the black box theatre the stage is doused in smoke. The dancers are amping themselves up. Models, drivers, rock-stars and wrestlers, they shift hazily between modes of competition, celebrity and stardom. Dressed in Eliza Cooper’s fitting mix of Lycra and leather, the three performers—Emma Harrison, Emma Riches and Frances Orlina—look great in cropped racing jackets over form fitting body suits, with motorbike helmets which they use as head coverings, podiums, shields and trophies throughout the work.

Emma Harrison’s choreography alternates between big, jazzy, rhythmic sequences, and oozy, curling slow-motion sections. There are major unison sections which are interjected with each of the dancers, at different moments, taking the lead or trailing the pack, keeping the cycle of ‘leader’ or ‘winner’ rotating between the three. This piqued my interest over and over again as I was always wondering who would rise to the top next.

With High Octane, as with her solo work Wolverine in 2024 (Sydney Festival), Emma Harrison has created seamless transitions between movement and text, crafting stories that complement the movement without being overly explanatory. With High Octane we hear monologues from Frances Orlina about her lust for stardom delivered while balancing precariously atop her racing helmet. From Harrison we get a frenzied take on a regional dance Eisteddfod, a call-back to her childhood. And in a section steeped in early 2000s nostalgia, Emma Riches excitedly recites a series of numbers, the numerical patterns of texts delivered via an early mobile keypad to a high-school boyfriend. Her quick, neat, detailed movement transforms into a series of proud poses. She has it all: mobile phone, love, and the promise of a bright future. She’s the top of the high-school food chain. Riches is impressive with in her precise mix of voice and movement, expertly toeing a line between the earnest and the satirical.

The props and other production elements of High Octane are impressive as well. A leaf blower becomes a wind machine that’s so forceful it distorts the dancers’ faces; motorbike helmets are symbols of strength, success and power, paraded around the stage, held high as if a conqueror is offering up enemy heads. A pile of ash rests in the back corner for the duration of the work, a fourth, vanquished competitor.

The neon greens, pinks and reds, with the re-occurring use of spotlights in Benjamin Brockman’s lighting design both expose the dancers and transform them into icons. The electronic sound design by Amy Flannery drives the dancers forward, inspiring and matching their persistence. The cleverly integrated sounds of a racetrack or a dial tone help build the world of the show.

Sound is a rich element in all aspects of this work. After a helmet clad headbutting battle, Riches is left defeated. She begins to wail. Harrison then Orlina join, their cries unexpectedly transforming into the sound of cars revving—an inspired moment. The performers’ voices become tires screeching, sirens blaring, a harrowing soundscape. The dancers disappear and reappear, in and out of smoke, as they struggle to press towards the front corner of the stage, making ground and then being pulled back into the fog. Harrison delivers a balletic yet very rock-and-roll solo. There are victory laps, purposeful posing from the others, first place eisteddfod solos and those earlier wrestlers and rock-stars return. Through intense strobing light the movement echoes the start of the work, this time with more attack and clarity, the dancers now mid-competition.

Finally, Emma, Emma and Frances collapse into their separate spotlights, alongside the pile of ashes. A sense of aftershock settles across the stage. Emma Harrison begins to sing, rallying herself and the others. They begin a broken resurrection. Their bodies rising and collapsing. A jagged and broken roll begins over to the pile of ashes. Grabbing, hoarding, and pulling the ash with their arms, legs and bellies, they spread it out across the white stage. The ash becomes asphalt as the dancers mark out a large oval, a racetrack; their bodies struggling to pave the track and out of the ashes a new start line emerges.

Emma Harrison, Emma Riches and Frances Orlina are a well-oiled machine in High Octane, a work that never quite breaks down or reaches its limit. At times we see exhaustion built into the movement, but we never fear that they will fail or push past the point of no return. The work never becomes so high octane that the movement itself is unsustainable, but it does point to a relentless need for all of us to be ‘on’. The competition is not a fight to the death, but a fight to stay in motion—to do it all and ‘have it all’.  

The team behind High Octane have created a work with access points for all audiences.  Harrison, Riches, Orlina, Brockman, Flannery, and Cooper have produced a great example of how production and performance can work together to create an engaging piece of contemporary dance—a form often accused of being inaccessible. As Harrison explains, High Octane “is garish and loud, it moves fast and doesn’t wait for you to catch up”, but I never felt left behind. In a work that required model-like poise, gritty floorwork and nuanced characterisation, the versatility and staying power of all the performers is to be applauded; as are the team at Campbelltown Arts Centre who continue to champion and present high-quality, independent, contemporary dance work in Sydney.

__________

HIGH OCTANE

Campbelltown Arts Centre, March 27-29, 2025

Director and Performer: Emma Harrison

Performer and Collaborator: Emma Riches

Performer and Collaborator: Frances Orlina

Lighting Designer: Benjamin Brockman

Sound Designer: Amy Flannery

Costume Designer: Eliza Cooper

Dramaturg: Adriane Daff

Outside Eye: Martin del Amo and Miranda Wheen

Understudy: Cassidy McDermott Smith

Production Manager: Jessica Pizzinga

Operator: Darcy Catto-Pitkin

Creative Producer: Anthea Doropoulos

Assistant Creative Producer: Anne Cutajar

__________

Phaedra Brown is an independent dancer, choreographer, and producer. Her current practice draws on a collage of elements from movement, choreography, writing, and curation.

Lexy Panetta on Love Arena

LOVE ARENA a captivating exploration of rhythm and organic forms

Remy Rochester & Jasmin Luna: concept, choreography and performers

Sydney Fringe Festival, Sydney Dance Company Neilson Studio, 28th September, 2024.

review by Lexy Panetta

Sydney based artists Jasmin Luna and Remy Rochester offered a fascinating exploration of rhythm and nature in their new contemporary dance duet Love Arena. The work left me hypnotised with its continual outpouring of energy, textured synchronicity and intricate detail.

Love Arena reflects the cyclical nature of our inner and outer worlds through an exploration of tension and resolve. The program notes declare the works exploration of ecological themes, specifically addressing “human symmetry with the natural environments”, which evidently reflected on the performers' (re)connection to organic harmony and rhythm. From the outset, Love Arena explores these themes through organic movement and attention to the embodiment of the subtle, harmonious rhythms of the Alyx Denison score, with which the dancers resonate and predict, preempt and follow. The symmetry of the score is also reflected in the choreography with its attention to dual patterns, not only in the fact that this is a duet, but also through the compositional choices that blur the lines between who is affecting who—the body of the other, one’s own body or the ‘body’ of the environment.

The work is called Love Arena because it refers to the proximity of two beings and their interdependence of energy, resonance, and rhythm within a shared space. The choreography reflects this through a variety of movement and spatial choices that evidence a call and affect resonance and symmetry, demonstrating a captivating exploration of rhythm and organic forms.

Love Arena’s design is minimalist. The stage is firstly set in a dull glow, making the dancers only just visible as they make small actions lying on the floor.  They nestle on their backs with their knees bent upwards to fit within the base of a cylindrical, draping net structure that cascades from the ceiling. The structure recalled a tree for me, a soft pillar in the centre of the stage with a texture of veins, evoking the softness of many organic forms.

The dancers unfurl, imitating the roots of this tree. The pulsating overhead lighting changes the design from dark low lighting to a warm glow, accompanied by a surging synth Dennison’s score, which signals to the dancers’ to evolve into their next state.

Here their movements synchronise, they are intricate, unfurling actions that move the dancers out from within their tree trunk into a pulsating light and soundscape. This alert   section felt like watching an organism change within a time-lapse of day and night.

Costumes in Love Arena were minimal, with warm and earthy toned trousers and a net textured fabric providing transparent coverage for the dancers’ upper bodies, it reminded me of moss. As the sleeves draped their arms, the costumes offered an organic continuation of their movements throughout the work, providing another visual element that complicated and obscured the silhouette of their human-organic forms.

The performers seemed engrossed by one another and began to expand out from the central prop, working as one unit, filling the voids of each other’s negative space. They moved with a combination of rippling energy and staccato pauses, shifting the physical reactions as they interplayed with one another’s positioning; either being affected by the other or relocating to replace the others shape in the space. The choreography tessellates through space, the dancers still engrossed in one another’s forms, shifting and collecting each other’s energy – again… it was difficult to discern who or what was being affected or doing the affecting.

After exploring the stage, tracing the rhythms of one another’s movements, they trailed off into individual explorations of those rhythms, interspersed with subtle synchronised sections. They minimise their movements, reduce their speed, retract back towards the netted trunk. They vibrate and surge back to their starting position, reflecting the completion of the cycle of their organic, rhythmic journey.

Whilst I think it would have been effective to see a more purposeful incorporation of the prop suspended from the ceiling, Remy Rochester & Jasmin Luna have created a strong work that encompasses an organic build using mirroring, rhythmical shifts and moments of unison. It would be great to see Love Arena offered the chance for further development, expanding on its founding concepts and extending it from its current short running time of 25 minutes. There was obviously a clear commitment in Love Arena from both performer/choreographers to maintain a steady intention in the work: the interplay of rhythm through which they sought to explore the cadences of each other, echoing from one body to another body, and from each to their environment and back again. It was a captivating work and demonstrated the potential of these two young choreographers. I hope they get other chances to show us what they can do.

__________

LOVE ARENA

Sydney Fringe Festival, Dance Hub, Sydney Dance Company Neilson Studio, 26-28 September 2024

Remy Rochester & Jasmin Luna: concept, choreography and performers

Composer: Alyx Dennison

Costumes and Set Design: Jasmin Luna

Lighting Designer: Saint Clair

Mentor: Kristina Chan

Supported by: Catapult Choreographic Hub, Legs on the Wall, Create NSW, Critical Path, Dance Makers Collective, Sydney Fringe Festival, and Sydney Dance Company.

__________

Alexandria (Lexy) Panetta is a Sydney-based independent artist, choreographer, and academic with interest in dance performance, improvisation, choreography, and film. Lexy also works part-time as a tutor at the Australian College of Physical Education (ACPE), is the Learning Associate for the Sydney Dance Company (SDC), and tours as a Teaching Artist for SDC.

Sarah Kalule on Plagiary

PLAGIARY an ambitious exploration of AI-integrated dance

Alisdair Macindoe: concept, direction, choreography, text, coding, sound design and set design

Sydney Opera House, Unwrapped Festival, 14th September 2024

reviewed by Sarah Kalule

Dimly lit dancers prepared behind a black scrim for the matinee of Plagiary, choreographed by Alisdair Macindoe, at Sydney Opera House’s Studio. Amongst them, a colourful array of clothes were lined up on racks as they dressed in mismatched outfits, finishing their costume with name-tagged bibs. Through projected captions and a robotic voice over, the audience was informed about the performance, including the option for participatory play—we received polarised glasses that blocked out the projections and the scrim stage wings. The grand gimmick was also revealed through the captions and voice: the performance was generated from randomised AI prompts that appeared on the screen as text throughout and was also fed to the dancers via their wireless earpieces. However, some ideas can only go so far, and here, for me, the concept outshone the work.

There were impressive concepts of plagiarism and autonomy shaping Plagiary. Responding to descriptive and action-based prompts, such as “walk onto the stage” and “traverse like gods”, the ten dancers floated and flickered across the stage, occasionally retreating behind the scrim. Their dancing was clearly experimental, carefully considered, and built upon technical contemporary dance skills. They displayed robust commitment as they transitioned through one postural phrase to the next in line with the AI’s fast paced commands, blurring the lines between self-initiative and AI responsive movement. However, ten minutes in, momentum plateaued. The work revealed its overall theme too early leaving little room for evolution. Perhaps this was an intentional decision, feeding into the idea of AI as a novice compared to human intelligence. The AI did prompt exciting sub-themes including AI-generated images, tales and interviews, however the lack of contrast and change as the performance evolved induced feelings of indifference. Even the performers’ ethereal gazes reflected their disconnect, making the work feel like a haphazard rehearsal. Had the AI fed the performers more risk-taking tasks, such as performing between states of compliance and rebellion, it might have made an impactful contrast. Nonetheless, the sameness of the prompts paved the way for the performers’ ability to make original choices. At times they were given the same task, but each unique take further affirmed their independence from the AI. While the overall theme was revealed too soon, these responses to tasks opened up a platform to query AI’s role in the performing arts, demonstrating the human choreographer as far more creative and capable in making performance.

The most compelling section of the work was a numbers game, where the dancers chose a number between one and five and moved when the AI called their number. With the prompt, “drop suddenly to the floor when you hear your number, then slowly rise”, their popcorn-like, explosive response brewed up an exciting anticipation. The audience did not know when the dancers would strike, offering a dynamic surprise as their movement was now unpredictable. Not only did this allow a contrasting moment in comparison to the force-fed prompts, this game was also an effective demonstration of flexible boundaries. It was a moment where AI and performers were working together and were dependent upon each other. Rather than having the AI set rigid frameworks, this numbers game set a foundational framework of performing a specific movement alongside the flexibility for the dancers to choose when to perform the movement, bringing the performers together as a harmonious ensemble. By working with the AI in this way, this further underscores the narrative of who’s in control—whether that be the AI or the performers.

In most cases, Macindoe positioned the AI as the dominant figure, but I question the sustainability of critiquing AI while leaning so heavily on it, if this was indeed his aim. Since AI lacks autonomy or desire, the effect of a controlling force feels inauthentic because it was really Macindoe orchestrating the initial ideas. The text prompts, ambient music and apocalyptic computer graphics, without deeper development, made the overall concept of the work feel awkward and emotionally flat.

While there were a couple of culturally diverse performers, the lack of equal representation limited the work’s depth. People from all walks of life have encountered AI, and an equal range of ages, body types, and dance experience would have enriched the interpretations, potentially further reflecting the diversity of unique perspectives.

Macindoe's Plagiary excels in initiating innovative performance ideas that interact with emerging technologies. Choreographically, there are compelling elements of body ownership where the performers’ decisions to enter or leave the stage contributed to a reclaiming of art affected by technology’s role in plagiarism. Performers Joel Fenton and Siobhan Lynch stood out as a hilarious and engaging duo in their impromptu interview, in which they recited the AI’s nonsensical tales. The ensemble was undoubtedly talented, displaying flair and commitment. The set design was a highlight, using playful light and shade effects with polarised glasses.

Though this Sydney premiere season was short, I would hope to see more development of Plagiary. Employing emerging technologies offers a gateway to explore untapped possibilities. However, when the excitement of AI fades, what makes the performance worth staying for? Answering this is crucial to prolonging momentum.

Plagiary is an ambitious and experimental exploration of AI-integrated dance, and with further development, it has the potential to succeed beyond using new technology as mere novelty.

PLAGIARY

Sydney Opera House, Unwrapped Festival, 12-14 September 2024

Alisdair Macindoe: concept, direction, choreography, text, coding, sound design and set design

Performers: Sam Beazley, Franky Drouisoti, Joel Fenton, Josh Freedman, Allie Graham, Tara Hodge, Grace Lewis, Siobhan Lynch, Frances Orlina, Sam Osborn

Video design, image design, coding: Sam Mcgilp

Software Development, Head Coder: Chris Chua

Costume Design, Prop Design: Andrew Treloar

Lighting Design: Amelia Lever-Davidson

Production Management: Zsuzsa Gaynor Mahaly

Producer: Penelope Leishman (Insite Arts)

Sarah Kalule is an artist exploring choreography, literature and experimental performance. With a strong interest in contemporary art theory, her current practice delves into her diasporic histories, theatrical jazz and presenting the body in space through bold imagery.

Erin Brannigan introduces Dancing Sydney Review Platform

Dancing Sydney Review Platform seeks to make a small contribution to addressing a lack of critical discourse, both now and historically, that would even begin to approach the published literature surrounding Australian visual art, music and theatre. Creative excellence requires dialogue with a community that is engaged, informed and committed. With space for arts reviews in major outlets slimmer than ever before, and a tradition of underwhelming or downright negligent publishing when it comes to dance criticism in this country, we need fresh strategies for gaining critical ground for Australian contemporary dance.

The already beleaguered artistic community involved in contemporary dance development and production in Australia might not survive one more widely read, but poorly informed critic. Yes, everyone's entitled to their opinion, but where is the equity in appointing expert commentators in our major papers across the visual arts, literature, theatre and dance who have an appropriate level of knowledge and care and can produce informed, well-written, and productively critical articles?

One example of this inequity is a recent review of INDance at Sydney Dance Company published in the SMH August 23, 2024. The critic opens with a wholesale damning of the field that amplifies the misconceptions and prejudices that the art form has been dogged by for many decades:

Modern dance cliches – the bad ones – often involve shapeless bags, near-darkness, long periods of repetitive or very slow movement and superfluous nudity. Perhaps this is why modern dance is sometimes unfairly labelled as self-indulgent or inaccessible.

Such repetitions of outdated clichés set us back yet again as we work to attract audiences to this artform through informed discourse. The sensationalist tone of this review is in line with ‘shock-jock tactics’: attempts to win reader attention at the expense of reviewing excellence. This is an extremely outdated and unethical mode, unworthy of publication in any self-respecting outlet.

Who evaluates the critic? Who has gained the stripes to translate Australian Contemporary Dance for broader audiences, an art form that has its references in international, cutting-edge practices, and the broader contemporary arts? Visual art criticism in this country has boasted giants such as Robert Hughes, controversial voices such as John McDonald, and a new generation of artist-critics such as Lisa Radford and Neha Kale. Literary criticism has had artist-critics such as Patrick White and Drusilla Modjeska as well as new voices Jeanine Leane, Cher Tan and Prithvi Varatharajan. Theatre has had the brilliant James Waites, Alison Croggan and my colleague at UNSW, John McCallum. Music has Andrew Ford and the brilliant Robert Forster.

Why is contemporary dance consistently shuffled into the 'too hard' basket? Where is the editorial duty-of-care? What attempts are made to research the best candidate for this work? RealTime arts journal did so much to build serious critical dialogue around dance, with an impressive roll call of top-notch writers; Eleanor Brickhill, Philippa Rothfield, and Andrew Fuhrmann. Justine Shih Pearson has published some excellent reviews in The Conversation, and Vicki Van Hout’s review blog for FORM Dance Projects (2013-) in Sydney provides crucial archives of works that may not have been covered anywhere else.

Dancing Sydney Review Platform is supported by local dance writers and scholars who see dance criticism as an essential part of any healthy dance ecology. In supporting new and emerging writers through editorial support and guidance, we hope to sow some seeds for future quality writings on dance.

Erin Brannigan